Resilience through Advanced Materials and SystemsPI’s personal website ↗
← Research area: Multi-hazard resilience
Seismic research program

Seismic resilience with GFRP reinforcement

An extensive ongoing research program connecting material behavior, structural experiments, system-level analysis, and future design provisions.

Engineering question

How can durable GFRP reinforcement be used in earthquake-resisting concrete systems while accounting for its material behavior and system-level demands?

The research connects durability and post-earthquake recovery challenges with experimental, analytical, and numerical investigations. The overview labels the five phases I–V; the progress report uses Phase 0–IV.
Program overviewThe research connects durability and post-earthquake recovery challenges with experimental, analytical, and numerical investigations. The overview labels the five phases I–V; the progress report uses Phase 0–IV.Open full-size ↗
Combined research & fellowship supportCAD $800k+

Across the research program, fellowships, and industrial support.

Academic and industry support

ACI NEx · NSERC · Mitacs · FRQNT

MST Rebar Inc. (MST-BAR), industrial partner

Research context

McGill University · Ongoing program

Research leadership

Yi Shao, PI
Yazhou (Tim) Xie, Co-PI
Seyed Mohammad Hosseini, Co-PI

Project advisor

Gregory G. Deierlein ↗
Stanford University

Program structure

Five connected research phases

Progress summarized from the August–September 2026 project report.

01Nonlinear modeling and preliminary frame analysisCore work completed

A validated OpenSees modeling framework, including strain penetration, followed by preliminary nonlinear frame evaluation and design insights.

02Bond and anchorage under seismic loadingCore work completed

Beam-end experiments, test-setup development, and analytical investigation of GFRP-to-concrete bond under reversed cyclic loading.

03Beam–column connection experimentsTesting completed; extended analyses ongoing

Two experimental series covering 12 connections, including GFRP and hybrid reinforcement configurations. Extended numerical and parametric work continues.

04Component and system-level numerical studiesMain studies completed; hybrid cases ongoing

Moment-frame and shear-wall modeling, nonlinear time-history analysis, parametric studies, incremental dynamic analysis, and fragility assessment.

05Code-form models and design provisionsOngoing

Development-length models, design and detailing provisions, seismic performance factors, and procedures and acceptance criteria for structural analysis.

Significance

From component evidence to seismic design

Component tests alone cannot establish how complete GFRP-RC systems will perform during earthquakes. This program addresses the missing connection between member behavior, system response, seismic demands, and reliable design criteria. Its findings are intended to inform future design standards for GFRP-reinforced seismic force-resisting systems.

A qualitative illustration of the gap between extensive component-level evidence and more limited knowledge of system-level behavior, seismic demand, fragility, and collapse.
The research gapA qualitative illustration of the gap between extensive component-level evidence and more limited knowledge of system-level behavior, seismic demand, fragility, and collapse.Open full-size ↗
Component evidence and validated models support system-level analysis, acceptance limits, and future design and detailing provisions.
Connecting deformation capacity with seismic demandComponent evidence and validated models support system-level analysis, acceptance limits, and future design and detailing provisions.Open full-size ↗
Research outcomes

Evidence across materials, members, and systems

Member modeling

A practical framework for GFRP-RC members that captures reinforcement response, concrete behavior, joint distortion, and strain penetration. Published in Engineering Structures in 2026.

Bond and anchorage

Completed beam-end experiments and analytical work examining cyclic GFRP bond behavior and its implications for anchorage and development length.

Connection behavior

Completed connection tests investigating confinement, reinforcement ratio, hybrid GFRP–steel and GFRP–stainless-steel reinforcement, and initial pulse loading.

Moment-frame performance

Comparative frame analyses examining GFRP and steel reinforcement, drift demands, residual deformation, failure progression, and collapse behavior.

Shear-wall assessment

Model validation and parametric studies linking wall properties to response measures, limit states, and seismic fragility.

Design development

Ongoing translation of research evidence into design and detailing models, performance factors, and analysis acceptance criteria.

Member and connection models are assessed against component experiments. Full multi-story system response remains an extrapolation, with system-level experimental validation an important next step.
Continuing research

Topics for forthcoming research outputs

  • Cyclic bond and development length of GFRP reinforcement
  • Inelastic deformation and detailing of beam–column connections
  • Shear-wall modeling and limit-state capacity prediction
  • Frame and wall fragility, collapse assessment, and seismic performance factors
  • Synthesis of reversed-cyclic component evidence for seismic design provisions
Related outputs

Publications

—

System-level seismic performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete moment frames: Comparison with steel-RC frames

Hosseini, S. M., Xie, Y., and Shao, Y.
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Seismic systemsUnder review

More papers from this project are expected in the near future.

WORK WITH US

Connect research with real structural challenges

Start a conversation ↗